DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26CV-02503·merced·Civil·Unlawful Detainer
Hearing about 2 months agoAppearance required

Parties withheld (CCP 1161.2)

Motion to Set Aside Default and Vacate Default Judgment

Hearing date
Jul 8, 2026
Department
9
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Ruling

Case Management Conference

Appearance required.

25CV-07188 Cavalry SPV I, LLC vs. Stacie Garza

Order to Show Cause Why Sanctions Should Not Be Imposed on Plaintiff’s Counsel for Failure to Appear at CMC and Failure to File CMC Statement

The Court has reviewed the declaration filed in opposition to the order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed against Plaintiff’s counsel for failure to appear at the case management conference on April 10, 2026, and for failure to file a CMC statement. The Court notes that Plaintiff’s counsel has not provided an explanation for the failure to appear. The Court imposes monetary sanctions in the amount of $100.00 with payment due twenty days from the date of notice.

Case Management Conference

Appearance required.

26CV-02052 [Parties’ names withheld pursuant to CCP § 1161.2(a)(1)]

Court Trial: Unlawful Detainer

Appearance required.

26CV-02213 [Parties’ names withheld pursuant to CCP § 1161.2(a)(1)]

Status Review of Settlement

Appearance required.

26CV-02397 [Parties’ names withheld pursuant to CCP § 1161.2(a)(1)]

Court Trial: Unlawful Detainer

Appearance required.

26CV-02503 [Parties’ names withheld pursuant to CCP § 1161.2(a)(1)]

Motion to Set Aside Default and Vacate Default Judgment

Appearance required. Any opposition and any reply to the opposition may be made orally at the hearing.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share