DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
30-2023-01359872·orange·Probate·Trust
Hearing about 2 months agoNot stated

Yale – Trust

Motion to Compel

Hearing date
Jul 8, 2026
Department
CM08
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Ruling

Superior Court of the State of California County of Orange TENTATIVE RULINGS FOR DEPARTMENT CM08 Temporary Judge Catherine Evans

Date: 07/08/2026

Court Room Rules and Notices

If the tentative rulings below are for a past date, please try the following to force a refresh of this page:

For a Windows-based computer, press “Cntrl” + “Shift” + “R” at the same time.

For an Apple computer, press “Cmd” + “Shift” + “R” at the same time.

# Case Name Tentative 1 Yale – Trust; 30-2023-01359872 Motion to Compel

2 Shaw – Trust; 30-2024-01390550 Demurrer

Amber Cherie Shaw and Cynthia Tracy Shaw (Respondents) demur to the Verified Amend Cross Petition (Petition) filed on 2/26/26 (ROA 479) by Petitioners Maureen Mary Shaw, Angela Shaw, Eastkings LLC, Eastsilvers LLC, Riverton Kiwi LLC, and Scarba Kiwi LLC (Petitioners).

A demurrer can be used only to challenge defects that appear within the “four corners” of the pleading, which includes the pleading, any exhibits attached, and matters of which the court is permitted to take judicial notice. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318.) Courts “‘treat the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions or conclusions of fact or law. [Citation.] We also consider matters which may be judicially noticed." (Id.) On demurrer, a complaint must be liberally construed. (Code Civ. Proc., § 452; Stevens v. Superior Court (1999) 75 Cal.App.4th 594, 601.) All material facts properly pleaded, and reasonable inferences, must be accepted as true. (Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital Dist. (1992) 2 Cal.4th 962, 966-967.)

On demurrer, a complaint must be liberally construed. (Code Civ. Proc. § 452; Stevens v. Superior Court (1999)

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share