DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV01486·santacruz·Civil·Class Action - Wage & Hour
Hearing about 2 months agoDENIED

DEWAR v. GOGH DELIVERY, LLC

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION AND PAGA SETTLEMENT

Hearing date
Jul 8, 2026
Department
Unknown
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Final Approval of Class Settlement rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffDEWAR
DefendantGOGH DELIVERY, LLC

Ruling

LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DATE: JULY 8, 2026 TIME: 8:30 A.M.

TENTATIVE RULINGS ARE NOT POSTED IN UNLAWFUL DETAINER CASES

Notice to prevailing parties: Local Rule 2.10.01 requires you to submit a proposed formal order incorporating, verbatim, the language of any tentative ruling – or attaching and incorporating the tentative by reference - or an order consistent with the announced ruling of the Court, in accordance with California Rule of Court 3.1312. Such proposed order is required even if the prevailing party submitted a proposed order prior to the hearing with two exceptions: (1) in unopposed matters where the moving party has provided a detailed proposed order or JCC form of order, or (2) where the tentative is simply to “grant”. Failure to comply with Local Rule 2.10.01 may result in the imposition of sanctions following an order to show cause hearing, if a proposed order is not timely filed.

No. 25CV01486

DEWAR v. GOGH DELIVERY, LLC

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION AND PAGA SETTLEMENT

The motion is denied without prejudice. On July 1, 2026, plaintiffs filed this motion, just 4 court days before the hearing on July 8, 2026. (Friday, July 4, was a court holiday.) Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1005, subdivision (b), and this Court’s order granting preliminary approval, the motion must have been filed at least 16 court days before the final approval hearing. Counsel did not timely file the motion, seek an order shortening time, or request a continuance of the final approval hearing so the motion is denied without prejudice

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share