Purvika Patel vs. Hung Dinh

LINE CASE NO. CASE TITLE TENTATIVE RULING 9:00 22CV404026 Lorena Ayala vs. Defendant moved this court to deem admissions propounded on plaintiff admitted. 1-2 Athiya Javid, MD., Defendant propounded admissions on Plaintiff in December of 2025. Plaintiff et.al. never responded. Defendant’s motion is GRANTED. Defendant’s motion for sanctions are GRANTED. 9:00 23CV421635 Tao Lin vs. See below. 3 Amazon.com Services 9:00 24CV432814 Alonzo Gallaread v. Defendant requests two further testing of Plaintiffs.

Although Court does have 4 Erik Montgomery, et. the discretion to order further testing of Plaintiffs, it appears that Plaintiffs have al. already endured significant and thorough neurological and mental testing. Defendant fails to show good cause as to why further testing is needed. Defendant’s motion is DENIED. 9:00 24CV443183 Shenna Huynh vs Plaintiff moves this court to compel disposition of expert witness and sanctions. 5-6 REDDIS LABS, INC. Although it appears that Defendant has produced the expert witness, Defendant took over one year to produce the witness and only produced the witness after Plaintiff filed its motion.

Although the petition to compel may be moot at this point, Plaintiff’s motion for sanctions is GRANTED. 9:00 24CV449389 Samita Bhandary vs. Plaintiff moves this court to vacate its previous order denying reconsideration of 7 Agradoot Ghatak, courts previous order strike plaintiff’s complaint without leave to amend. The Court et.al. finds that the previous court engaged in a thorough analysis in rendering both opinions to strike the complaint and to deny reconsideration. Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED. 9:00 24CV455357 Corey Geroy vs.

Ford Defendant moves this court for summary adjudication on Plaintiff’s sixth cause of 8 Motor Company, action alleging fraudulent inducement. No opposition was filed against this motion. et.al. Defendant’s motion is GRANTED. 9:00 24CV453537 Brandon Hillburn vs. Case to be continued. 9 Ford Motor Company, et.al. 9:00 24CV454552 Robert Busto vs. Ford See below 10 Motor Company, et.al. 9:00 26CV490111 Zhan Ping Ye, et.al. Plaintiffs request a preliminary injunction from Defendants imposing a $14,855.31 11 vs.

Board of Directors emergency assessment. Defendants comprise a Homeowner’s Association which of Summerton determined an emergency assessment per condominium unit for health and safety Condominium issues. Court determines that the assessment was not arbitrary and that Plaintiff’s Association, et.al. are not likely to prevail. Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction is DENIED. 9:01 25CV465961 Mariner Finance, LLC Defendant’s attorney moves this court to relieve himself as counsel. No objection 1 vs.

Vickie Lee Hunter was filed. Defendant’s attorney’s motion is GRANTED. 9:01 25CV466259 Purvika Patel vs. Defendant moves this court to accept Elizabeth Favoro as pro hac vice counsel for 2 Hung Dinh Defendant. No opposition was filed and Ms. Favoro satisfies the statutory criteria. Defendant’s motion is GRANTED.