DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26CV01240·butte·Civil·Probate
Hearing 3 months agoGRANTED

In re: Guzman Jr, Gregorio Garcia

Change of name (adult)

Hearing date
Jun 3, 2026
Department
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerGuzman Jr, Gregorio Garcia

Ruling

The Court is faced with a “he said, she said” dispute. Plaintiff essentially says they previously had access to broad reporting functions in AppFolio. Defendant says they did not. Mr. Lux’s declaration (Exhibit 4) establishes that while some reports are accessible with view only access, accounting reports are not. Notably, Plaintiff submits no evidence by way of example of a type of report Plaintiff made prior to the discontinuation of service that they now claim they cannot access. Based on the evidence before the Court, Plaintiff has not met its burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that Defendants violated paragraph 4 of the Court’s Order.

13. 26CV01237 In re: Stowie, Joshua Eugene

EVENT: Change of name (minor)

There is no proof of publication on file. Upon the filing of the proof of publication, the Court will sign the decree provided.

14. 26CV01240 In re: Guzman Jr, Gregorio Garcia

EVENT: Change of name (adult)

The Court is in receipt of the proof of publication and will sign the decree provided.

5|Page

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share