DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
FPT-25-378678·sf·FamilyLaw·Child Support and Attorney Fees
Hearing 2 months agoCONTINUED

TAMARA ROJO v. ISAAC ELEAZAR HERNANDEZ FERNANDEZ

REQUEST FOR ORDER: ADOPT RECOMMENDING MEDIATOR; CONTINUE JUNE 11TH HEARINGS; TEMPORARY EMERGENCY ORDER; CHILD SUPPORT; ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS

Hearing date
Jun 11, 2026
Department
404
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerTAMARA ROJO
RespondentISAAC ELEAZAR HERNANDEZ FERNANDEZ

Ruling

1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4

5) 6 TAMARA ROJO,) Case Number: FPT-25-378678) 7 Petitioner) Hearing Date: June 11, 2026) 8 VS.) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM) 9 ISAAC ELEAZAR HERNANDEZ FERNANDEZ,) Department: 404) 10 Respondent) Presiding: MARTIN TRIANO) 11) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER: ADOPT RECOMMENDING MEDIATOR; CONTINUE JUNE 11TH 13 HEARINGS. FILED BY PETITIONER ON 5/22/26; REQUEST FOR ORDER: TEMPORARY 14 EMERGENCY ORDER, ADOPT RECOMMENDING MEDIATOR, CONTINUE JUNE 11TH 15 HEARINGS; REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: CHILD SUPPORT, AND CHILD SUPPORT ADD-ONS, 16 BONUS SUPPORT, ETC.; REQUEST FOR ORDER RE ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS 17 TENTATIVE RULING 18 The parties shall appear in person or by Zoom and be prepared to discuss a visitation 19 schedule for Summer 2026.

The Court intends to continue the hearings on Mother’s Requests for 20 Order re: child support and attorney’s fees and Father’s Request for Order re: attorney’s fees, 21 with an order for Father to file and serve an updated Income and Expense Declaration at least 30 22 calendar days prior to the continued hearing date. 23 If a party chooses to appear by Zoom, that party must abide by the Notice and Instructions 24 for Remote Appearance in San Francisco Family Court set forth above. 25

29

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share