DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
30-2023-01362017·orange·Civil·Civil
Hearing about 2 months agoTBD

Ascencio vs. Akbarzadeh

Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Summary Adjudication

Hearing date
Jul 7, 2026
Department
N15
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Summary Judgment rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffAscencio
DefendantAkbarzadeh

Ruling

4. Whether Civil Procedure Code sections 917.1 to 917.9 mandates a stay of this case pending appeal in the circumstances of this case.

9 Ascencio vs. Akbarzadeh Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Summary Adjudication

30-2023-01362017 The court does not have a written tentative ruling in this case. The parties or their counsel shall be ready to address the following issue:

1. Whether Proposition 22 only addresses labor classifications and labor disputes as they relate to driver benefits, or whether it also affects tort liability for injuries to third parties.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share