CHAPMAN vs LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL SECURITY LLC

24CV098072: CHAPMAN vs LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL SECURITY LLC 07/07/2026 Hearing on Motion to Compel Discovery (not "Further Discovery") filed by LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL SECURITY LLC (Defendant) CRS# 021381713377 in Department 16

Tentative Ruling - 07/02/2026 Victoria Kolakowski

Lawrence Lab's Motion to Compel Document Production is granted in part.

I.

Background

Plaintiff Joseph Chapman filed a Complaint against his former employer, Defendant Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC (Lawrence Lab), arising from alleged disability discrimination and retaliation in violation of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, among other reasons. (Compl. ¶¶ 11–37, Nov. 1, 2024.) Lawrence Lab filed an Answer generally denying the allegations, among other things. (Answer, Dec. 18, 2024.)

In December 2024, Lawrence Lab served Chapman with a set of document requests. (O’Malley Supp. Mot. Compel ¶ 3, Feb. 9, 2026.) Through request 7, Lawrence Lab requested production of “[a]ll diaries, notes, e-mail, letters, memoranda, recordings, calendars or logs maintained by [Chapman] which contain any reference to, or notations concerning [Chapman’s] employment or the separation of [Chapman’s] employment.” (Id.) In response, Chapman stated: “[Chapman] does not have any responsive documents in his possession, control, or custody despite conducting a diligent search and reasonable inquiry.” (Id.)

At his deposition in September 2025, Chapman testified about the existence of a daily log. (Id. ¶ 4.) Lawrence Lab requested that Chapman produce the daily log at his continued deposition. (Id. ¶ 5.) Chapman did not do so. (Id. ¶ 6.) On February 4, 2026, Lawrence Lab emailed a letter requesting that Chapman produce his daily log within two days. (Id. Ex. F.)

On February 9, 2026, hearing nothing from Chapman, Lawrence Lab moved to compel production of the daily log and for a $5,959.50 sanction upon Chapman. (Mot. Compel.)

Chapman opposed the Motion. (Opp’n Mot. Compel, June 24, 2026.) In it, Chapman stated that following meet and confer efforts with Lawrence Lab, he produced the daily log. (Id. 3:8–9; see also Hemming Decl. Opp’n Mot. Compel Ex. A, at 2:25–3:1, June 24, 2026.)

II.

Discussion

The Motion is moot insofar as Lawrence Lab requested that Chapman produce the daily log. But the Motion remains ripe insofar as Lawrence Lab requested sanctions. The Court finds that a $500.00 sanction upon Chapman and his counsel, jointly, is merited. Chapman acted without substantial justification in failing to fulfil his discovery obligations concerning document request 7, and failing to correct his inaccurate and incomplete response and production when brought to his attention. The reduced sanction is appropriate here as Lawrence Lab’s meet and confer 24CV098072: CHAPMAN vs LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL SECURITY LLC 07/07/2026 Hearing on Motion to Compel Discovery (not "Further Discovery") filed by LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL SECURITY LLC (Defendant) CRS# 021381713377 in Department 16 efforts on this issue were marginal, and further meet and confer efforts would have likely resolved the production issue without the need of the Court’s intervention.

III. Orders The Motion is granted in part.

The Court imposes a $500.00 sanction upon Chapman and his counsel, jointly, payable to Fox Rothschild LLP no later than 20 days after Lawrence Lab serves notice of entry of this order.

***

The Motion to Compel Discovery (not Further Discovery) - 1 moving party, 1 motion filed by LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL SECURITY LLC on 02/09/2026 is Granted in Part.

Jasmine Lynn Anderson (Attorney) representing LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL SECURITY LLC (Defendant) must forthwith serve a copy of this order on all counsel of record and self-represented parties, and file proof of service.

If a party does not timely contest the foregoing Tentative Ruling and appear at the hearing, the Tentative Ruling will become the order of the court.

How Do I Contest a Tentative Ruling? Find your case in eCourt at https://eportal.alameda.courts.ca.gov/ using “Case Search” or “Calendar Search” (after you log in) Select the Tentative Rulings Tab Select "Click to Contest this Ruling" Enter your name and briefly identify the issues you wish to argue. Select "Proceed"

You must also notify the department via email (Dept16@alameda.courts.ca.gov) and opposing parties by no later than 4:00 PM, one court day before the scheduled hearing.

Please provide this information to any opposing parties.

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT THE HEARING/CONFERENCE WILL BE IN- PERSON WITH THE OPTION TO APPEAR REMOTELY.

COUNSEL AND PARTIES MAY APPEAR EITHER IN-PERSON IN DEPARTMENT 16 AT THE ADMINISTRATION BUILDING OR BY REMOTELY THROUGH THE

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA

24CV098072: CHAPMAN vs LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL SECURITY LLC 07/07/2026 Hearing on Motion to Compel Discovery (not "Further Discovery") filed by LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL SECURITY LLC (Defendant) CRS# 021381713377 in Department 16 ZOOM PLATFORM. ZOOM LOG-IN INFORMATION FOR DEPARTMENT 16 IS BELOW.

Join ZoomGov Meeting https://alameda-courts-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/j/16024053017 Meeting ID: 160 2405 3017