MOTION FOR SET ASIDE/VACATE JUDGMENT
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD26682257 - July 7, 2026 Hearing date: July 7, 2026 Case number: CUD26682257 Case title: THE JOHN STEWART COMPANY VS. REGINALD BLAIR Case Number: | | CUD26682257 | Case Title: | | THE JOHN STEWART COMPANY VS. REGINALD BLAIR | Court Date: | | 2026-07-07 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR SET ASIDE/VACATE JUDGMENT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 7, 2026. Line 16. DEFENDANT REGINALD BLAIR MOTION FOR SET ASIDE/VACATE JUDGMENT HEARING REQUIRED.
Defendant Reginald Blair and process server Ricky Mendez to appear in person or via Zoom with video capabilities.
No later than 9:00 a.m. on July 7, 2026, Plaintiff to electronically serve a copy of the video referenced in the Declaration of Ricky Mendez on defense counsel and provide a copy of said video to department 501 on a USB flash drive. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.
A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”