DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
2024CLBC028947·ventura·Civil·Debt Collection
Hearing about 2 months agoGRANTED. The Dismissal entered on April 8, 2025 is vacated and judgment is entered in favor of Capital One, N.A. and against Defendant Jessica Y. Serrato in the amount of $1,096.61.

CAPITAL ONE, N A vs JESSICA Y SERRATO

Motion to Vacate Dismissal and to Enter Judgment Under Terms of Stipulated Settlement

Hearing date
Jul 2, 2026
Department
41
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$1,096.61

Parties

PlaintiffCAPITAL ONE, N A
DefendantJESSICA Y SERRATO

Ruling

2024CLBC028947: CAPITAL ONE, N A vs JESSICA Y SERRATO 07/02/2026 in Department 41 Motion to Vacate Dismissal and to Enter Judgment Under Terms of Stipulated Settlement

BEFORE THE HONORABLE JANET M. FRANGIE Assigned Judge Below are the Court’s tentative decisions with respect to the matters on calendar. The Court may adopt, modify, or change the tentative ruling after hearing. The tentative ruling has no legal effect unless and until adopted by the Court.

If you wish to submit on the Court’s tentative decision without appearing, please send an email to the following address by 8:00 a.m. on the date of the hearing with counsel for all parties copied on your email: courtroom41@ventura.courts.ca.gov Please state on the subject line of your email: “SUBMISSION ON TENTATIVE”, Case Number, Title and Party. If fewer than all parties submit on the tentative, the hearing will proceed, and the tentative decision is subject to change.

Unless stated otherwise at the hearing, if a formal order is required but not signed at the hearing, the prevailing party shall prepare a proposed order and comply with CRC 3.1312 subdivisions (a), (b), (d) and (e). The signed order shall be served on all parties and a proof of service filed with the court. A "notice of ruling" in lieu of this procedure is not authorized.

If you are an attorney or Pro Per and your case is on calendar, you can appear remotely by Zoom for Case Management Conferences and Law & Motion matters. You cannot appear remotely for trials or any matter where testimony or evidence is going to be admitted. This court no longer allows remote appearances by CourtCall. Zoom is the exclusive means by which counsel can appear remotely. Represented parties, interested persons, witnesses, and the public at large, cannot attend remotely. You cannot forward the Court's Zoom link to others so that they can attend remotely. Courtroom 41 is open to the public and such individuals can attend by physically appearing in the courtroom. While appearing remotely by Zoom, it is unlawful to video or audio record the proceedings or take screen shots/still photos of the proceedings.

To appear remotely by Zoom, you must register by 3 p.m. the court day before your hearing by filling out the registration form found on the Courtroom 41 section of this webpage: https://ventura.courts.ca.gov/remote-appearances. When appearing by Zoom, you will need to mute yourself and turn your camera off until your case is called. The court calendar begins at 9 a.m.

2024CLBC028947: CAPITAL ONE, N A vs JESSICA Y SERRATO

Assuming you have given advance email notice the court day before your hearing of your intent to appear by Zoom, you may enter the Courtroom 41 Zoom waiting room at 8:15 a.m. on the day of your hearing through this link:

https://ventura-courts-ca.zoom.us/j/81985625079?pwd=cHV2MENmWGNLSnJCMl M5Sk1xRk 0vdz09

For information about Judge DeNoce including his case management and trial rules, please visit: www.DeNoce.com

Request for Judicial Notice: the Court grants Plaintiff’s request and takes judicial notice of the Stipulation Agreement filed on March 17, 2025, pursuant to Evidence Code § 452(c), (d), (g), and (h).

Motion:

The unopposed motion is granted. The Dismissal entered on April 8, 2025 is vacated and judgment is entered in favor of Capital One, N.A. and against Defendant Jessica Y. Serrato in the amount of $1,096.61.

Moving party is directed to give notice.

2

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share