DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
VCU332542·tulare-civil·Civil·Song Beverly
Hearing about 2 months agoTo order this matter transferred to Kings County. Case Management Conference is continued.

Correa, Estella vs. FCA US, LLC

Order to Show Cause as to Change of Venue re: Defendant; Order to Show Cause as to Change of Venue re: Plaintiff; Defendant FCA's Motions to Compel Mandatory Initial Depositions of Plaintiff Estella Correa and Plaintiff Sofia Cruz; Sanctions

Hearing date
Jul 2, 2026
Department
1
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Sep 22, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffEstella Correa
PlaintiffSofia Cruz
DefendantFCA US, LLC
DefendantHanford Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram

Ruling

Tulare County (Civil) - Civil - https://www.tulare.courts.ca.gov/general-information/tentative-rulings Tentative Rulings Civil Tentative Rulings and Probate Examiner Recommendations are available below. All attempts possible are made to have the information on these pages updated by 3:00pm the day prior to hearing in order to allow for any needed continuances or travel if an appearance should be required.

Civil Tentative Rulings: The court does not issue tentative rulings on Writs of Attachment, Writs of Possession, Claims of Exemption, Claims of Right to Possession, Motions to Tax Costs After Trial, Motions for New Trial, or Motions to Continue Trial. Under California Rules of Court, rule 3.1308 and Local Rule 701, any party opposed to the tentative ruling must notify the court and other parties by 4:00 p.m. today of their intention to appear for oral argument. The court's notice must be made by facsimile (fax) to 559-733-6774; by email to research_attorney@tulare.courts.ca.gov; or by telephoning (559) 730-5010.

Probate Examiner Recommendations: For further information regarding a probate matter listed below you may contact the Probate Document Examiner at 559-730-5000 ext #1430. The Probate Calendar Clerk may be reached at 559-730-5000 Option 4, then Option 6. Note: The court does not issue probate examiner recommendations on petitions for approval of compromise of claim.

Current Tentative Rulings The Tentative Rulings for Thursday, July 2, 2026, are: Re: Correa, Estella vs. FCA US, LLC Case No.: VCU332542 Date: July 2, 2026 Time: 8:30 A.M. Dept. 1-The Honorable David C. Mathias Motion: (1) Order to Show Cause as to Change of Venue re: Defendant; (2) Order to Show Cause as to Change of Venue re: Plaintiff; Defendant FCA's Motions to Compel Mandatory Initial Depositions of (3) Plaintiff Estella Correa and (4) Plaintiff Sofia Cruz; Sanctions

Tentative Ruling: (1) and (2): To order this matter transferred to Kings County. Case Management Conference is continued to September 22, 2026; 8:30 am; D1 to verify transfer. If transferred, no appearances required.

Facts and Analysis Common to (1) and (2) In this Song Beverly matter, Plaintiffs' allege a February 28, 2021, purchase of a 2021 Jeep Cherokee, VIN 1C4PJMLB2MD157009 (the "Vehicle") from Defendant Hanford Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram, located in Kings County. (FAC P.5.) The Court has set orders to show cause hearings as to both Plaintiffs and Defendants as to why this matter should not be transferred to Kings County. No response by either side has been provided regarding the venue issue. Therefore the Court orders this case transferred to the County where Plaintiffs allege they purchased the Vehicle, Kings County.

Facts and Analysis Common to (3) and (4) There is no tentative ruling on these motions.

If no one requests oral argument, under Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5(a) and California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312(a), no further written order is necessary. The minute order adopting this tentative ruling will become the order of the court and service by the clerk will constitute notice of the order.

Court reporters are usually not available for law and motion matters in the civil division. The parties and counsel must provide their own reporter if they want a transcript of the proceedings.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share