DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24CV-03252·merced·Civil·General Civil
Hearing about 2 months agoAppearance required.

Patricia Bever vs. Erin May, et al.

Case Management Conference; Status Conference – Status of Answer

Hearing date
Jul 1, 2026
Department
9
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffPatricia Bever
DefendantErin May
DefendantLeighann Hardin May

Ruling

627 W. 21st Street, Merced

Wednesday, July 1, 2026 10:00 a.m.

The following tentative rulings shall become the ruling of the court unless a party gives notice of intention to appear as follows: 1. You must call (209) 725-4240 to notify the court of your intent to appear.

2. You must give notice to all other parties before 4:00 p.m. of your intent to appear. Per California Rules of Court, rule 3.1308(a)(1), failure to do both items 1 and 2 will result in no oral argument. Note: Notifying CourtCall (the court’s telephonic appearance provider) of your intent to appear does not satisfy the requirement of notifying the court.

Case No. Title / Description

24CV-03252 Patricia Bever vs. Erin May, et al.

Case Management Conference

Appearance required. This action was filed on July 3, 2024. A proof of service was filed on July 19, 2024, indicating service of the summons and complaint on defendant Erin May on or about July 16, 2024. The Court notes that on May 1, 2026, Plaintiff requested dismissal of the action against defendant Leighann Hardin May. To date, defendant Erin May has not filed a responsive pleading and Plaintiff has not filed a request for entry of default. Appear to address status of entry of default.

Status Conference – Status of Answer

Appearance required.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share