DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24CV452905·santaclara·Civil·Personal Injury
Hearing about 2 months agoGRANTED

Mayra Perez Campos et al. v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. et al.

motion to compel deposition

Hearing date
Jul 2, 2026
Department
10
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$600

Parties

PlaintiffMayra E. Perez Campos
DefendantAmerican Honda Motor Co., Inc.

Ruling

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 10 Honorable Jeffrey B. El-Hajj Blanca Than, Courtroom Clerk 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408-882-2210

DATE: July 2, 2026 TIME: 9:00 A.M. / 9:01 A.M. To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. Make sure to let the other side know before 4:00 P.M. that you plan to contest the ruling. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1308(a)(1); Local Rule 8.D.)

**Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and counsel**

Line 3 24CV452905 Mayra Perez Campos Defendant American Honda Motor Co., Inc.’s (Honda) motion to et al. v. American compel deposition of plaintiff Mayra E. Perez Campos. Notice is Honda Motor Co., Inc. proper and the motion is opposed by plaintiffs.

“If, after service of a et al. deposition notice, a party to the action ... without having served a valid objection under [Code of Civil Procedure] section 2025.410, fails to appear for examination, or to proceed with it, or to produce for inspection any document, electronically stored information, or tangible thing described in the deposition notice, the party giving the notice may move for an order compelling the deponent’s attendance and testimony, and the production for inspection of any document, electronically stored information, or tangible thing described in the deposition notice.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 2025.450.)

Plaintiff Mayra Campos failed to appear for a properly noticed deposition. Plaintiffs argue the motion is moot because plaintiffs’ counsel contacted Honda’s counsel on June 18, 2026 (i.e., the same day the opposition to this motion was due, and six months after the motion was filed) to inquire about other deposition dates. The motion is not moot, as the deposition has not occurred. And plaintiffs provide no substantial justification for waiting until the opposition in this matter was due before attempting to reschedule the deposition.

The motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff Mayra Campos must sit for a deposition (and produce any requested documents) no later than July 31, 2026.

Honda’s request for sanctions is GRANTED IN PART. Plaintiffs and their counsel of record must pay Honda sanctions in the amount of $600 (two hours at $300/hour), no later than July 31, 2026. The court will prepare the court.

Line 4 25CV458886 Niloufar Nouri et al. v. Click LINE 4 or scroll down for ruling. Tesla Insurance Services, Inc. et al.

3

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share