DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26CV186419·alameda·Civil·Class Action
Hearing about 2 months agoGRANTED

TILGHMAN, ON BEHALF OF HERSELF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, AND THE GENERAL PUBLIC, vs NOCAL VENTURES LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, et al.

Complex Determination

Hearing date
Jul 2, 2026
Department
21
Prevailing
Moving Party
Next hearing
Apr 19, 2027

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$1,000.00$18,000.00

Parties

PlaintiffTILGHMAN
DefendantNOCAL VENTURES LLC

Ruling

26CV186419: TILGHMAN, ON BEHALF OF HERSELF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, AND THE GENERAL PUBLIC, vs NOCAL VENTURES LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, et al. 07/02/2026 Complex Determination Hearing in Department 21

Tentative Ruling - 06/25/2026 S. Raj Chatterjee

ORDER RE: COMPLIANCE

The Court has ordered the following after review of the case.

COMPLEX DETERMINATION - GRANTED CLASS ACTION

COMPLEX DETERMINATION

The Court designates this case as complex pursuant to Rule 3.400 et seq. of the California Rules of Court. Counsel are advised to be familiar with the Alameda County Local Rules concerning complex litigation, including Rule 3.250 et seq.

Pursuant to Government Code Sections 70616(a) and 70616(b), a single complex fee of one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) must be paid on behalf of all plaintiffs. For defendants, a complex fee of one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) must be paid for each defendant, intervenor, respondent or adverse party, not to exceed, for each separate case number, a total of eighteen thousand dollars ($18,000.00), collected from all defendants, intervenors, respondents, or adverse parties. All such fees are ordered to be paid to Alameda Superior Court, within 10 days of service of this order.

PORTAL INFORMATION

Calendar information, filings, and tentative rulings are available to the public athttps://eportal.alameda.courts.ca.gov/. All counsel are expected to be familiar and to comply with pertinent provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, the California Rules of Court, the Alameda County Superior Court Local Rules and the procedures outlined on the domain web page of the assigned department. Counsel should review the portal information for Departments 21 and 18 available on the web.

CLASS CERTIFICATION MOTION DEADLINE

Plaintiff must file a motion for class certification by 04/19/2027.

Judicial: Non-Appearance Case Review re: Deadline to File Motion for Class Certification is scheduled for 04/19/2027 at 02:30 PM in Department 21 at Rene C. Davidson Courthouse. 26CV186419: TILGHMAN, ON BEHALF OF HERSELF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, AND THE GENERAL PUBLIC, vs NOCAL VENTURES LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, et al. 07/02/2026 Complex Determination Hearing in Department 21 The Court finds that this deadline provides sufficient time for the parties to complete class discovery. See generally CRC 3.764(b). The parties are expected to diligently proceed with undertaking discovery necessary for determining class certification and to timely resolve any disputes that arise, including bringing any necessary motions, to meet this deadline.

MANDATORY JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT

At least seven calendar days before the Initial Case Management Conference (“CMC”), the parties shall file a Joint CMC Statement on pleading paper. All parties who have appeared shall participate in the Joint CMC Statement. The Joint CMC Statement should address from each party’s perspective each issue set forth in CRC Rule 3.750(b). The Joint CMC Statement should also address any additional matters that any party believes will advance the action. For all subsequent CMCs, the parties shall file a Joint CMC Statement on pleading paper setting for the status of the action and any appropriate matters. The Joint CMC Statement shall be filed at least 7 calendar days before the CMC.

SUMMARY DISCOVERY MOTION PROCEDURES BY STIPULATION

The Complex Civil Departments 18 and 21 permit parties to submit discovery disputes by stipulation under summary procedures that are posted in the Court’s portal pages.

SERVICE OF THIS ORDER

Counsel for plaintiff(s) shall have a continuing obligation to serve a copy of this order on newly joined parties defendant not listed on the proof of service of this order and file proof of service. Each party defendant joining any third-party cross-defendant shall have a continuing duty to serve a copy of this order on newly joined cross-defendants and to file proof of service.

The Court orders counsel to obtain a copy of this order from the eCourt portal.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share