DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24CV083809·alameda·Civil·Partition Action
Hearing about 2 months agoThe parties are ORDERED TO APPEAR.

CHAN vs LE, et al.

Motion - Other Distribution of Partition Sale Proceeds

Hearing date
Jul 2, 2026
Department
23
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCHAN
DefendantLE

Ruling

24CV083809: CHAN vs LE, et al. 07/02/2026 Hearing on Motion - Other Distribution of Partition Sale Proceeds in Department 23

Tentative Ruling - 06/29/2026 Ruben Sundeen

The Court considers this an effective default prove-up matter. Based on the allegations in the Complaint, it appears that all costs were incurred for the common benefit.

The Court further notes that the supplemental declaration filed on 6/16/2026 does not fully address the Court's request for evidence that Plaintiff paid the sale costs.

The parties are ORDERED TO APPEAR.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share