DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
PR2025-0166·yolo·Civil·Probate
Hearing about 2 months agoDENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE

In re McLemore Virgil

Motion to compel answers to form and special interrogatories and requests for production; for an order that the truth of all matters specified in the requests for admissions be deemed admitted, for sanctions, including reasonable attorney’s fees

Hearing date
Jul 2, 2026
Department
Fourteen
Judge
Prevailing
Opposing Party
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerMarcel Myres
RespondentSandra R. Gordon

Ruling

Case: In re McLemore Virgil Case No. PR2025-0166 Hearing Date: July 2, 2026 Department Fourteen 9:00 a.m.

Respondent Sandra R. Gordon’s motion to compel answers to form and special interrogatories and requests for production; for an order that the truth of all matters specified in the requests for admissions be deemed admitted, for sanctions, including reasonable attorney’s fees is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 2030.290 subd. (b), 2031.300, subd. (b), 2033.280, subd. (b).) Respondent did not file a proof of service at least five court days before the hearing, showing that petitioner Marcel Myres was properly served with the moving papers. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1300(c); see also Code Civ. Proc., § 1005, subd. (b).)

The notice of motion does not provide notice of this Court’s tentative ruling system as required by Local Rule 11.2(b). Counsel for moving party, or the moving party if unrepresented by counsel, is ordered to notify the opposing party or parties immediately of the tentative ruling system.

If no hearing is requested, and no party appears at the hearing, this tentative ruling is effective immediately. No formal order pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312 or further notice is required.

4 of 8

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share