DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CVCV21-0198186·shasta·Civil·Civil
Hearing about 2 months agoDISCHARGED

FASSBINDER, ET AL. VS. PG&E CORPORATION, ET AL.

Order to Show Cause Re: Sanctions

Hearing date
Jul 6, 2026
Department
63
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Sanctions rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffFassbinder
DefendantPG&E Corporation

Ruling

CASE NUMBER: CVCV21-0198186 Tentative Ruling on Order to Show Cause Re: Sanctions: An Order to Show Cause Re: Sanctions issued on May 20, 2026 to Plaintiffs’ counsel and Defendants’ counsel for failure to provide the Court with status of the JCCP action. The matter was on calendar on May 11, 2026 and the tentative ruling required an appearance because neither party had filed a status statement. Neither party appeared, therefore, no status was provided. Plaintiffs have since filed a status statement informing the Court that a request for dismissal with prejudice will be filed shortly in the JCCP and counsel’s intent is to do the same in this court. The Order to Show Cause is DISCHARGED. The matter is on calendar today at 9:00 a.m. for status.

HALL VS. LICKLITER, ET AL.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share