DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV-0207587·shasta·Civil·Dismissal
Hearing about 2 months agoCONTINUED

HYDE VS. FRANCIS, ET AL.

Review hearing

Hearing date
Jul 6, 2026
Department
64
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Parties

PlaintiffHyde
DefendantDenise Francis
DefendantJames Opps

Ruling

CASE NUMBER: 25CV-0207587 DISCLOSURE: Prior to taking the bench, Judge Birss worked in private practice as an attorney. Judge Birss previously represented Denise Francis and James Opps in separate and unrelated proceedings. His representation of both falls outside the time period requiring recusal. That prior representation does not impact his ability to be fair and impartial.

This matter is on calendar for review regarding status of judgment/dismissal. The Court notes that Plaintiff attempted to dismiss the case on May 28, 2026. The clerk cannot process the request for dismissal until the Plaintiff remits the waived court fees pursuant to Government Code section 68637. No status statement has been filed. An appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

NELSON VS. ROMANO, ET AL.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share