DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
2025-01534410·orange·ComplexCivil·Pro Hac Vice
Hearing about 2 months agoGRANTED

Carrasco vs. Disney Destinations, LLC

Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice

Hearing date
Jul 2, 2026
Department
CX102
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$500

Parties

PlaintiffCarrasco
DefendantDisney Destinations, LLC
DefendantThe Walt Disney Company
DefendantWalt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc.

Attorneys

Ryan Chabotfor Defendant

Ruling

103 Carrasco vs. Disney Destinations, LLC

2025-01534410

Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice

Defendants Disney Destinations, LLC; The Walt Disney Company; and Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc.’s application for pro hac vice admission of attorney Ryan Chabot is GRANTED.

On or before the anniversary of the date of this order, if this attorney remains counsel for the moving parties, the moving parties must pay an annual renewal fee of five hundred dollars ($500) for each year that the attorney maintains pro hac vice status in this case. (Gov. Code, § 70617, subd. (e)(2).)

Moving parties shall provide notice. 104 Corelogic, Inc. vs. Underwriters at Lloyds Syndicate 4711 Asp Subscribing To Policy No. B0713medte2001034

2025-01521725 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice

Plaintiffs’ application for pro hac vice admission of attorney Timothy P. Law is GRANTED.

On or before the anniversary of the date of this order, if this attorney remains counsel for the moving parties, the moving parties must pay an annual renewal fee of five hundred dollars ($500) for each year that the attorney maintains pro hac vice status in this case. (Gov. Code, § 70617, subd. (e)(2).)

Moving parties shall provide notice. 105 Medero vs. Norada Capital Management

2024-01445239 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice

The unopposed application of Thomas Kimble for admission to appear Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED.

The supplemental documents demonstrate that all requirements of California Rules of Court, Rule 9.40 are satisfied. ROA 156, 158.

On or before the anniversary of the date of this order, if the attorney remains counsel for the moving parties, the moving parties must pay an annual renewal fee of five hundred dollars ($500) for each attorney and each year that the attorney maintains pro hac vice status in this case. (Gov. Code, § 70617, subd. (e)(2).)

Moving party is ordered to give notice and file proof of service within five (5) calendar days of this order.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share