DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
2021-01238237·orange·ComplexCivil·Final Accounting
Hearing about 2 months agoGRANTED

Ordona vs. First Class Nurses, Inc.

Final Accounting

Hearing date
Jul 2, 2026
Department
CX102
Prevailing
Plaintiff
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffOrdona
DefendantFirst Class Nurses, Inc.

Ruling

TENTATIVE RULINGS 7/02/2026 02:00 PM

100 Hernanez vs. Santa Ana Country Club

2023-01335144

Final Accounting

The settlement administrator, Atticus Administration, LLC, has confirmed that the distribution of the settlement funds has been completed and made in accordance with the terms of the settlement that were approved by the Court.

As Plaintiffs have shown that the administrator’s work is complete, the Court’s file may now be closed.

Plaintiffs are ordered to give notice of this ruling to Defendant. 101 Ordona vs. First Class Nurses, Inc.

2021-01238237 Final Accounting

The settlement administrator, ILYM Group, Inc., has confirmed that the distribution of the settlement funds has been completed and made in accordance with the terms of the settlement that were approved by the Court.

As Plaintiffs have shown that the administrator’s work is complete, the Court’s file may now be closed.

Plaintiffs are ordered to give notice of this ruling to Defendants. 102 Andrawes Husary vs. Shahidi

2025-01487294 1. Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice (as to Rona S. Li) 2. Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice (as to Brian French)

Specially Appearing Defendants John Shahidi; Nelk, Inc.; Metacard, LLC; Nelk USA, Inc.; and Kyle Forgeard’s applications for pro hac vice admission of attorneys (1) Brian M. French and (2) Rona S. Li are GRANTED.

On or before the anniversary of the date of this order, if the attorneys remain counsel for the moving parties, the moving parties must pay an annual renewal fee of five hundred dollars ($500) for each attorney and each year that the attorney maintains pro hac vice status in this case. (Gov. Code, § 70617, subd. (e)(2).)

Moving parties shall provide notice.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share