DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
PRO1801087·marin·Probate·Civil
Hearing about 2 months agoDismissed as moot.

IN THE MATTER OF DONN R. SCHOENMANN

Motion for New Trial and/or Other Relief

Hearing date
Jul 2, 2026
Department
C
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

OtherE. Lynn Schoenmann

Ruling

PRO1801087 IN THE MATTER OF DONN R. SCHOENMANN

Motion for New Trial and/or Other Relief, filed by E. Lynn Schoenmann on 1/30/26.

Ruling. This matter is dismissed as moot. The Court confirms the jury trial set to begin on October 27, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. in Department J; and the status conference set for December 10, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. in Department C.

PRO2300893 LOUIS THEODORE KIRCOS, ESTATE OF

Sixth Report of Status of Administration and Petition for Continuation of Administration of Estate, filed by Caron Schmierer on 6/3/26.

Ruling. Absent objections, the Sixth Report of Status of Administration is accepted and approved. Personal Representative is ordered to comply with the following future dates: 1. Status on Closing Estate. a. Either: (1) a Petition for Final Distribution; or (2) a Seventh Report of Status of Administration shall be filed by September 17, 2026, as required by Probate Code sections 12200-12201. b. A status hearing re filing the Petition or Report shall be set on October 8, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. i. If neither document has been timely filed, an appearance will be required. ii. If the Petition or Report is timely filed, the hearing will be set on October 8, 2026, at 9:00 a.m.

PLEASE NOTE: Probate cases that are designated as confidential by California law will not be posted online. For tentative rulings in those matters, please contact the judicial secretary at (415) 444- 7260. Page 6 | 9

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share