DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV00829·santacruz·Civil·Debt Collection
Hearing 2 months agoGRANTED

TD BANK, N.A. v. McDONALD

PLAINTIFF TD BANK, N.A.’S MOTION TO DEEM ITS REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION ADMITTED AND FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS

Hearing date
Jun 25, 2026
Department
Judge
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$500.00

Parties

PlaintiffTD BANK, N.A.
DefendantRaymondo McDonald Jr.

Ruling

LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DATE: JUNE 25, 2026 TIME: 8:30 A.M.

No. 25CV00829

TD BANK, N.A. v. McDONALD

(UNOPPOSED) PLAINTIFF TD BANK, N.A.’S MOTION TO DEEM ITS REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION ADMITTED AND FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS

The unopposed motion is granted. The Court deems admitted all matters specified in the requests for admission, set one. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2033.280, subd. (b).) This will be the order of the Court unless defendant serves, before the hearing on the motion, a proposed response to the requests for admissions that is in substantial compliance with Code of Civil Procedure section 2033.220.

“If a party to whom requests for admission have been directed fails to serve a timely response, the requesting party may move for an order that the genuineness of any documents and the truth of any matters specified in the requests be deemed admitted, as well as for a monetary sanction pursuant to Section 2023.030 of the Code of Civil Procedure.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 2033.280, subd. (b).) Monetary sanctions are mandatory if requested. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2033.280, subd. (c).)

Plaintiff TD Bank, N.A. demonstrated it served a set of requests for admission on defendant Raymondo McDonald Jr. on January 30, 2026. No responses have been served to date. (Chen Declaration, ¶¶ 2-4, Exhibit 1.) Defendant also failed to file any opposition to this motion, despite a record of proper service.

Sanctions are imposed against defendant in the amount of $500.00, payable no later than July 31, 2026.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share