DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24PR00307·santabarbara·Civil·Conservatorship
Hearing 2 months agoCONTINUED

Conservatorship of Jean Marie Stotts

Petition for Appointment of Temporary Conservator

Hearing date
Jun 24, 2026
Department
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Ruling

Case Number

Case Type Conservatorship Hearing Date / Time Wed, 06/24/2026 - 09:30 Nature of Proceedings Petition for Appointment of Temporary Conservator Tentative Ruling Probate Notes: Appearances required.

The following must be submitted: Proof of Service of Notice of Hearing. There is no Proof of Service on file. Notice of the hearing shall be served five days prior to the hearing on the proposed conservatee's spouse, parents, grandparents, children, grandchildren, and brothers and sisters (named in the Petition for Appointment of Conservator at P. 11). [Prob. C. Sec. 2250(e)(2)] The Code does not specify the method of service, but service by mail is presumably sufficient.

Further Briefing. Petitioner must file a Memorandum of Points and Authority showing why the Court has authority to grant a conservatorship over the estate under the current circumstances of this case. The memorandum must include discussion of Part 6 of Division 4 of the Probate Code, especially whether this Court has authority to pierce the protections of the conservatee's spouse outlined in sections 3012 and 3051, and whether a conservatorship over the estate can be justified in this case instead of using the procedures outlined in Article 3, Chapter 2 of Part 6 of Division 4 (Sec.Sec.3080 et seq.). Petitioner should at least reference, if not discuss the principles enshrined in, and the history of Article 3 outlined in Conservatorship of Bower (2016) 247 Cal.App.4th 495, and how those principles and that history should be considered in the Court's decision in this case.

Tentative Ruling: Ancieto Sierra Hernandez vs Railway Jonata LLC Tentative Ruling: Ancieto Sierra Hernandez vs Railway Jonata LLC

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share