DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
202200573245PRCE·ventura·Probate·Probate
Hearing about 2 months agoThe court intends to approve the Second Account and Report with fee adjustments.

In the Matter of Verna L. Hazlewood

Account and Report

Hearing date
Jun 30, 2026
Department
J6
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party
Next hearing
Jun 27, 2028

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$12,477.50$467.39$34,029.50$11,271.00$1,081,339.52$38,048.69

Attorneys

Robert M. Baskinfor Petitioner

Ruling

202200573245PRCE: In the Matter of Verna L. Hazlewood 06/30/2026 in Department J6 Account and Report 2nd Account & Report for the period of 02/28/24 through 02/27/26

Notice is insufficient. The mandatory Notice of Hearing (GC-020) not filed. Petitioner attaches a proof of service to the petition stating that the Second Account and Report was served by mail on 05/07/26. The mandatory Notice of Hearing was not served.

The court intends to approve the Second Account and Report. The Court intends to reduce the attorney fees of $12,477.50 to attorney Robert M. Baskin (575.00/hr) to 450.00 an hour and approve reimbursement of costs to attorney Baskin in the amount of $467.39.

The requested conservator fees total $34,029.50 for the period of 03/04/24 – 01/28/26, a period of almost 23 months, which is $1,479.84/month in conservator fees. Trustee fees for the same time period are $11,271.00, or an additional $490/month. This totals $1,969.88/month in fiduciary fees per month. The ending estate value is $1, 081,339.52 and the income for the account period totals $38,048.69. The court requests the conservator/attorney to be aware of the depletion rate of this estate and.

The court intends to approve conservator fees of $34,029.50 and trustee fees of $11,271.00.

The conservator/trustee to file and serve the Third Account and Report for the period of 02/28/26 – 02/27/28 by 05/09/28 and sets a hearing on the Third Account and Report on 06/27/28 at 9:00 a.m. in Department J6.

The clerk shall give notice.

1

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share