REQUEST FOR ORDER: CONSOLIDATE WITH FDV CASE; REQUEST FOR ORDER TEMPORARY EMERGENCY ORDER, PROPERTY CONTROL, CONSOLIDATE WITH FDV CASE, BUYOUT FAMILY RESIDENCE, OR OST
1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4
5) 6 EHSAN HAMIDI,) Case Number: FDI-25-801833) 7 Petitioner) Hearing Date: June 30, 2026) 8 VS.) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM) 9 ALLISON PAZ,) Department: 404) 10 Respondent) Presiding: AI MORI) 11) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER: CONSOLIDATE WITH FDV CASE; REQUEST FOR ORDER 13 TEMPORARY EMERGENCY ORDER, PROPERTY CONTROL, CONSOLIDATE WITH FDV CASE, 14 BUYOUT FAMILY RESIDENCE, OR OST 15 TENTATIVE RULING 16 Having read and considered the pleadings, declarations, and other evidence submitted in this matter, the 17 Court makes the following findings and orders: 18 A.
Procedural History 19 1) Petitioner Ehsan Hamidi (Father) and Respondent Allison Paz (Mother) married on 5/12/2023 20 and separated on 7/20/2025, for a marriage of 2 years and 2 months. The parties have one minor 21 child, Esther (DOB: 8/16/2023, age 2). Mother is represented by attorneys Stacey Poole and 22 Nancy Nugent. 23 2) On 7/23/2025 in related Case No. FDV-25-818545, Mother filed a Request for Domestic 24 Violence Restraining Order (DVRO) seeking protection for herself and the parties’ daughter 25 against Father. 26 3) Per the Stipulation and Order filed 12/8/2025 in Case No.
FDV-25-818545 which includes the 27 following orders: 28 a. Neither party shall solicit or initiate in-person contact with the other party. 29
1 b. The parties shall share joint legal and physical custody of Esther based on a 2-2-3 2 schedule. 3 c. The parties shall select a mutually agreed-upon child custody mediator to assist in 4 developing a comprehensive parenting plan including a long-term parenting schedule. 5 d. Mother shall continue to have exclusive use of the real property located at 3019 6 Broderick St. San Francisco, CA 94123 (“marital residence”) until 4/1/2026 and the 7 parties will meet and confer regarding the disposition of the marital residence.
If the 8 parties have not reached a mutual agreement as to who will buy out the other party’s 9 interest in the marital residence by 4/1/2026, the parties shall proceed with listing the 10 house for sale and shall further meet and confer regarding the terms and process of such 11 sale. 12 e. Father shall continue to pay the carrying costs of the marital residence pending further 13 written agreement of the parties or court order. 14 f. Mother’s Request for a DVRO shall be dismissed without prejudice. 15 4) On for hearing is Mother’s Request for Order filed 4/24/2026 asking the Court to grant her 16 temporary exclusive use, possession, and control of the marital residence pending its sale and to 17 consolidate the FDI case with the related FDV case. 18 5) On 5/12/2026, Mother filed an ex parte Request for Order stating that she presented a buyout 19 offer to Father on 3/31/2026 (after delays caused by her appraiser) for the marital residence which 20 includes reimbursement to Father for his claimed Family Code section 2640 separate property 21 contribution to the property.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Mother asks the Court to order: 22 a. Mother be allowed to buy out Father of the Broderick Residence for $680,616 and 23 Mother will agree to a reasonable deadline for her to pay this amount to Father; 24 b. An order shortening time for a hearing if the Court is not inclined to order the buyout at 25 the ex parte hearing and allow Mother to continue to reside in the residence until the 26 hearing; OR 27 c. A judicial settlement conference to obtain judicial assistance to a settlement on this issue. 28 6) On 5/12/2026, Father filed a Responsive Declaration asking the Court to make the following 29 orders:
1 a. Deny any request by Mother to force the sale of the property under her proposed terms; 2 b. The parties to proceed with the two listing agents selected by the parties and that the 3 family residence be staged and listed for sale forthwith; 4 c. Order Mother to vacate the property by May 31, 2026 so that the parties can stage the 5 property and list it for sale or order a specific move-out date which the Court feels would 6 be reasonable under the circumstances 7 d. Take Judicial Notice under California Evidence Code Section 452 (Court 8 Records/Verifiable Facts) and Section 453, of Mother’s Declaration and 9 acknowledgement made under penalty of perjury in her declaration of Father’s FC 10 Section 2640 reimbursement claims in the amount of $552,237 for Father’s separate 11 property portion of the community property residence and order that amount be credited 12 towards Father’s equity when the property ultimately sells. 13 7) Per the Temporary Emergency (Ex Parte) Orders filed on 5/12/2026, the Court denied both 14 parties’ requests pending a hearing set for 6/30/2026.
The Court ordered the parties to file and 15 serve update declarations at least 10 days before the 6/30/2026 hearing informing the Court of 16 any new developments regarding the residence. The Court also consolidated the FDV case into 17 and under the FDI case. 18 8) On 6/22/2026, Mother filed a Supplemental Declaration. Mother states all parties signed a 19 Stipulation stating that if the marital residence is sold, all net proceeds from the sale of the marital 20 residence will remain in a blocked account and inaccessible to either party absent further court 21 order.
Mother states that the parties agreed to use two listing agents, one of Father’s choosing and 22 one of Mother’s choosing Mother also states, “At a Status Conference on June 1, 2026, the Court 23 indicated that it expected both parties to abide by the December 8, 2025 stipulation, and meet and 24 confer regarding the house listing. At the Status Conference, the Court also indicated that it 25 would not make any orders as to the listing, my moving out, or any other issues because the Court 26 had no information from the listing agents as to what work would be necessary to ready the house 27 for sale, what differing opinions the agents may have on listing price or date, or any other 28 relevant information.
The Court did order that I make the house available to Ehsan’s agent to tour 29 the home.” Mother states that, to date, she has not received a request from Father’s agent to tour
1 the residence and her agent has not heard from Father’s agent to meet and confer regarding listing 2 prices, listing date, work necessary to prepare the home for sale, etc. Mother states that she does 3 not know why Father and his agent have “gone silent.” Mother further states, “Given there has 4 been no movement from Ehsan or his realtor, I do not believe there is any further action the Court 5 needs to take at this time related to the May 12, 2026 RFO or sale of the house as there are no 6 disputes on that issue at this time.” 7 9) Father did not file an Update Declaration. 8 B.
Findings and Order 9 1) As Mother indicates there are currently no disputed issues regarding the marital residence, and 10 Father has not filed an Update Declaration, the Court makes no additional orders at this time. 11 2) The relief requested in Mother’s Request for Order filed 4/24/2026, her ex parte Request for 12 Order filed 5/12/2026, and Father’s Responsive Declaration filed 5/12/2026 is denied without 13 prejudice. 14 3) Mother’s attorney shall prepare the Findings and Order After Hearing. 15 4) Preparation of Order: If you are directed by the court to prepare the order after hearing – within 16 10 calendar days of the hearing you must either: (a) Serve the proposed order to the other 17 party/counsel for approval, and follow the procedures set forth in CA Rules of Court, Rule 18 5.125(c), or (b) If the other party did not appear or the matter was uncontested, submit the 19 proposed order after hearing directly to the court.
Failure to submit the order after hearing within 20 10 days may allow the other party to prepare a proposed order and submit it to the court in 21 accordance with CA Rules of Court, Rule 5.125(d). 22
26
29