DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25627260·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing about 2 months agoHearing Required. Process Server and Shulika Benzes to be present in person or via Zoom with video capability.

CHRISTOPHER SMOAK VS. SHULIKA BENZES ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion To Set Aside Entry Of Default, To Preclude Entry Of Any Default Judgment, And For Leave To File Answer

Hearing date
Jun 30, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCHRISTOPHER SMOAK
DefendantSHULIKA BENZES

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25627260 - June 30, 2026 Hearing date: June 30, 2026 Case number: CGC25627260 Case title: CHRISTOPHER SMOAK VS. SHULIKA BENZES ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25627260 | Case Title: | | CHRISTOPHER SMOAK VS. SHULIKA BENZES ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-06-30 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Set Aside Entry Of Default, To Preclude Entry Of Any Default Judgment, And For Leave To File Answer; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities |

Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for June 30, 2026. Line 5. DEFENDANT Motion To Set Aside Entry Of Default, To Preclude Entry Of Any Default Judgment, And For Leave To File Answer; Hearing Required. Process Server and Shulika Benzes to be present in person or via Zoom with video capability. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share