DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV468267·santaclara·Civil·Withdraw as Attorney
Hearing 2 months agoGRANTED

Mercy Falls, LLC vs United Security Specialists, Inc. et al

Motion to Withdraw as attorney

Hearing date
Jun 24, 2026
Department
12
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMercy Falls, LLC
DefendantUnited Security Specialists, Inc.

Attorneys

Ruling

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 12 Honorable Nahal Iravani-Sani, Presiding Courtroom Clerk, Ryan Nguyen 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: (408) 882-2230

DATE: 06/24/2026 TIME: 9:00 and 9:01 A.M.

LINE # CASE # CASE TITLE RULING LINE 1 24CV428612 Plaza Services, LLC vs Motion: Set Aside Default/Judgment George Berry Please Ctrl Click on (or scroll down to) Line 1

LINE 2 24CV434201 Balbinder Kaur vs Motion: Attorneys Fees & Costs General Motors, LLC LINES 3-4 25CV456689 Richard Chamberlain vs Hearing: Motion to Strike Santa Clara Public Hearing: Demurrer Defender’s Office et al Please Ctrl Click on (or scroll down to) Line 3 LINES 5-6 25CV460503 Roy Toledo vs D.H. Motion: Sanctions & Protective Order Smith Company, Inc. Please Ctrl Click on (or scroll down to) Line 5 LINE 7 25CV471073 John Doe L.M., an Motion: Compel individual, vs Craig Chandler et al Please Ctrl Click on (or scroll down to Line 7) LINES 8 25CV478936 Ari Lazier vs Walnut Hearing: Petition Compel Creek Ford et al Arbitration

Please scroll down to Line 8

9:01 CASE # CASE TITLE RULING LINE 1 25CV468267 Mercy Falls, LLC vs Motion: Withdraw as attorney United Security Specialists, Inc. et al Notice is proper. No opposition received. Attorney Jacqueline Simonovich’s motion to be relieved as counsel for Plaintiff Mercy Falls LLC is GRANTED.

Movant to e-file Form MC-053 within 2 days of the hearing. Movant shall give notice to Plaintiff within 2 days of the date of the hearing, including the following: Plaintiff must appear at the Further Case Management Conference (to be scheduled) in Department 12. * Counsel to appear for scheduling*

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share