DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24CV453871·santaclara·Civil·Lemon Law / Breach of Warranty
Hearing 2 months agoCONTINUED

Cathleen Bauer v. Ford Motor Company et al

Motion to be relieved as counsel

Hearing date
Jun 23, 2026
Department
10
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCathleen Bauer
DefendantFord Motor Company

Ruling

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 10 Honorable Jeffrey B. El-Hajj Blanca Than, Courtroom Clerk 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408-882-2210

DATE: June 23, 2026 TIME: 9:00 A.M. / 9:01 A.M. To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. Make sure to let the other side know before 4:00 P.M. that you plan to contest the ruling. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1308(a)(1); Local Rule 8.D.)

**Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and counsel**

Line 3 25CV459257 Alexander Xue v. Defendant CRJ Partners V, LLC’s demurrer to the complaint. Notice is CRJ Partners V, not proper; there is no proof of service of the demurrer or its supporting LLC documents. The hearing on the demurrer is CONTINUED to February 4, 2027, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 10. Defendant is ordered to file a new notice of demurrer reflecting the new hearing date. Defendant must serve plaintiff with the new notice, the demurrer, and all supporting documents. The court will prepare the order.

Line 4 23CV427303 Highlander Home, Click LINE 4 or scroll down for ruling. Inc. v. Walmart, Inc. Line 5 24CV444940 Bank of America, Plaintiff Bank of America, N.A.’s motion to vacate dismissal and enter N.A. v. Anthony judgment by stipulation against defendant Anthony Snyder. (Code Civ. Snyder Proc., § 664.6.) Notice is proper and the motion is unopposed. The parties signed a stipulation for entry of judgment in 2024, under which defendant agreed to make installment payments to pay off a debt. A declaration in support of the motion indicates defendant stopped making payments.

On good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED. The November 19, 2024 order of dismissal is VACATED. Moving party to submit proposed order and proposed judgment, indicating damages of $6,355.22 and costs of $643.56. Line 6 25CV465581 Christina Hatzistratis Click LINE 6 or scroll down for ruling. v. Powerflex Solar, LLC

- oo0oo - 9:01 A.M. LINE # CASE # CASE TITLE RULING Line 1 24CV453871 Cathleen Bauer v. Ford Plaintiff’s counsel’s motion to be relieved as counsel. Parties to Motor Company et al appear.

- oo0oo -

3

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share