DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
M-CV-0094880·placer·Civil·Civil
Hearing 3 months agoGRANTED

CAMPBELL WASHBURN v. FLYING J RANCH

Specially Appearing Defendants Motion to Quash Improper Service of Summons

Hearing date
Jun 4, 2026
Department
3
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Quash rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCAMPBELL WASHBURN
DefendantFLYING J RANCH, LLC
DefendantSHANNON B. JONES LAW GROUP, INC.
Defendant300 DIABLO, LLC
Defendant300 DIABLO II, LLC

Ruling

PLACER COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT THURSDAY, CIVIL LAW AND MOTION DEPARTMENT 3 THE HONORABLE MICHAEL W. JONES TENTATIVE RULINGS FOR JUNE 4, 2026, AT 8:30 A.M.

2. M-CV-0091212 WELLS FARGO BANK v. FINIGAN, CARLY

The motion for judgment on the pleadings is dropped from calendar in light of defendant’s bankruptcy proceedings.

3. M-CV-0094880 CAMPBELL WASHBURN v. FLYING J RANCH

Specially Appearing Defendants Motion to Quash Improper Service of Summons

Preliminary Matters

Defendants’ requests for judicial notice are granted.

Ruling on Motion

Defendants move to quash the service of summons on them pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 418.10. Notably, defendants contend service was improper because it was accomplished pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 415.40 despite defendants being in California.

Where, as here, defendants challenge the “courts personal jurisdiction on the ground of improper service of process[,]” plaintiff bears the burden “to prove the existence of jurisdiction by proving, inter alia, the facts requisite to an effective service.” (Summers v. McClanahan (2006) 140 Cal.App.4th 403, 413.)

Plaintiff does not oppose the motion and thus does not meet its burden to prove the existence of jurisdiction. Even assuming arguendo plaintiff did oppose the motion, the service effectuated here is nonetheless improper because defendants are California residents and have a presence in California.

Accordingly, defendants’ motion is granted. The service of summons made on defendants Flying J Ranch, LLC, Shannon B. Jones Law Group, Inc., 300 Diablo, LLC, 300 Diablo II, LLC are hereby quashed.

///

PLACER SUPERIOR COURT – DEPARTMENT 3 Thursday Civil Law and Motion – Tentative Rulings

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share