DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
23-CIV-05709·sanmateo·Civil·Motion to be Relieved as Counsel
Hearing 2 months agoDENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE

MIKHAIL MAALOULI VS. MATTHEW TODD FREDRICKSEN, ET AL

Motion to be Relieved as Counsel

Hearing date
Jun 24, 2026
Department
28
Prevailing
Opposing Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMIKHAIL MAALOULI
DefendantMATTHEW TODD FREDRICKSEN

Attorneys

NATALIE KORDNAIJfor Defendant

Ruling

July 24, 2026 Law and Motion Calendar Judge Nicole S. Healy Department 28 ________________________________________________________________________

02:00 PM LINE 2 23-CIV-05709 MIKHAIL MAALOULI VS. MATTHEW TODD FREDRICKSEN, ET AL

MIKHAIL MAALOULI NATALIE KORDNAIJ MATTHEW TODD FREDRICKSEN

Motion to be Relieved as Counsel

TENTATIVE RULING:

The unopposed motion of Navid T. Nour to be relieved as counsel of record for plaintiff Mikhail Maalouli is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The court’s May 19, 2026 Order Shortening Time required counsel to serve the moving papers and the order on plaintiff by U.S. mail, return receipt requested, and by email and text message. To date, no proof of service has been filed.

If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the court. Thereafter, plaintiffs’ counsel shall prepare a written order consistent with the court’s ruling for the court’s signature, pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312 and Local Rule 3.403(b)(iv), and provide written notice of the ruling to all parties who have appeared in this action. The order should be e-filed only, do not email or mail a hard copy to the court.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share