DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25-CLJ-04634·sanmateo·Civil·Civil Action
Hearing 2 months agoGRANTED

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. VS. FRANCISCO J TORIBIO

MOTION FOR AN ORDER DEEMING THE TRUTH OF THE MATTERS SPECIFIED IN PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS AS ADMITTED

Hearing date
Jun 23, 2026
Department
4
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffWELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
DefendantFRANCISCO J TORIBIO

Attorneys

EDGAR B LOPEZfor Plaintiff

Ruling

June 23, 2026 Law and Motion Calendar PAGE 42 Judge: HONORABLE NANCY L. FINEMAN, Department 04 ________________________________________________________________________

2:00 PM LINE 18 25-CLJ-04634 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. VS. FRANCISCO J TORIBIO

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. EDGAR B LOPEZ FRANCISCO J TORIBIO PRO SE

MOTION FOR AN ORDER DEEMING THE TRUTH OF THE MATTERS SPECIFIED IN PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS AS ADMITTED

TENTATIVE RULING:

The court GRANTS plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s unopposed motion to deem facts admitted.

On August 20, 2025, plaintiff served by mail defendant Francisco J. Toribio with requests for admissions. (Declaration of Edgar B. Lopez, ¶¶ 2, 3 & Ex. 1.) More than thirty-five days have passed and there have been no responses. Plaintiff sent a meet-and-confer letter to defendant and there has been no response. (Id., ¶ 5, Ex. 2.) Accordingly, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 2033.420, the court deems the requests admitted. Plaintiff shall attach the requests for admission to the proposed order.

Plaintiff did not request sanctions and thus none are awarded.

If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the court. Thereafter, counsel for plaintiff shall prepare a written order consistent with the court’s ruling for the court’s signature, pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312, and provide written notice of the ruling to all parties who have appeared in the action, as required by law and the California Rules of Court.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share