DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24CV02783·santabarbara·Civil·Civil Law & Motion
Hearing about 2 months agoCONTINUED

Global Assets Liens & Foreclosures LLC vs Alpha Core Inc

Right to Attach

Hearing date
Jun 29, 2026
Department
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Aug 31, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Ruling

Case Number

Case Type Civil Law & Motion Hearing Date / Time Mon, 06/29/2026 - 10:00 Nature of Proceedings Right to Attach Tentative Ruling

On May 20, 2024, plaintiff Global Assets Liens & Foreclosures, LLC, (Global) filed its complaint against defendant Alpha Core, Inc. (Alpha) asserting claims for breach of contract and common counts. A default was originally entered against Alpha on January 28, 2025. On February 20, 2025, Alpha filed its motion to set aside the default. On August 4, 2025, the court granted Alpha's motion and set aside the default. On September 18, 2025, Alpha filed its answer to the complaint. In its motion to set aside default, in its answer, and in subsequent documents, Alpha has appeared by counsel, attorney Sydney Hall, whose office address of record is in San Mateo, California.

On March 10, 2026, Global filed its application for right to attach order and for issuance of writ of attachment, together with supporting papers. All proofs of service of these papers shows service by mail solely on Alpha's address in Oakland, California.

"Except for service of a subpoena or other process to require the attendance of the defendant or service of a paper to bring the defendant into contempt, if the defendant has an attorney of record in the action, service shall be made on the attorney rather than on the defendant." (Code Civ. Proc., Sec. 482.070, subd. (e).) There is no proof of service showing service, timely or otherwise, on Alpha's attorney of record.

Accordingly, hearing on this application and the case management conference also set for this date are continued to August 31, 2026, to allow for service by plaintiff of notice of the application, and notice of continuance of the hearing and case management conference.

Tentative Ruling: Juan Gutierrez vs JM Roofing Company Inc et al Tentative Ruling: Juan Gutierrez vs JM Roofing Company Inc et al

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share