Luk vs. Johnson

Superior Court of the State of California County of Orange TENTATIVE RULINGS FOR C61 HON. JENNIFER M. MCCARTNEY

Date: 6/24/2026 Courtroom Rules and Notices

The Court will continue to upload tentative rulings as they are completed. Please be sure to keep checking until 8:30 AM on the day of your hearing.

Written responses, oppositions, or filings that are filed later than 12:15 PM the day before the hearing on the motion will go on second call by the Court for the Court to have an opportunity to review any lastminute filings. If a party files a written response, opposition, or any filing after 12:15 PM on the day before the hearing, the party must ensure they are available for the court's afternoon calendar the day of the hearing.

Submitting on tentative rulings: If all counsel intend to submit on the tentative ruling and do not desire oral argument, please advise the Courtroom Clerk or Courtroom Attendant by calling (657) 622-5261 – both counsel need to state they are submitting on the tentative. Please do not call the Department unless all parties submit to the tentative ruling. If all sides submit on the tentative ruling and so advise the Court, the tentative ruling shall become the Court’s final ruling, and the prevailing party shall give notice of the ruling and prepare an order for the Court’s signature if appropriate under Cal. R. Ct. 3.1312.

Non-appearances: If nobody appears for the hearing and the Court has not been notified that all parties submit on the tentative ruling, the Court shall determine whether the matter is taken off calendar or the tentative ruling becomes the final ruling. The Court also might make a different order at the hearing. (Lewis v. Fletcher Jones Motor Cars, Inc. (2012) 205 Cal.App.4th 436, 442, fn. 1.)

# Case Name Tentative 2 Luk vs. Johnson The Court staff will provide counsel with the rulings on the objections that were filed with the Court.

Due to the extremely voluminous filings and evidence, including counsel filing until 6/23/2026 at 2:25 PM on this matter, the Court’s extensive calendar, and other voluminous filings, the Court will be continuing the motion for summary judgment. The Court will not accept any further filing on the motion.

3 30-2026-01556931 The Court has read and considered the Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Northwood Place Judgment (ROA 42). Apartments LLC vs. Ostrowski A judge properly grants summary judgment when there are no triable issues of material facts and judgment is warranted as a matter of law. (California Code of Civil Procedure § 437c(c); Bailey v. San Francisco District Attorney’s Office (2024) 16 Cal. 5th 611, 620.)

The Plaintiff has the burden of establishing an unlawful detainer action for non-payment of rent pursuant to CCP 1161(2). Here, the Plaintiff established