DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
FDI-19-790987·sf·FamilyLaw·Property Division
Hearing 3 months agoCONTINUED

SWATI SALUNKE v. VIKRAM SALUNKE

REQUEST FOR ORDER: FINANCIAL SETTLEMENT FROM COMMUNITY PROPERTY

Hearing date
Jun 2, 2026
Department
404
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Aug 11, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Parties

PetitionerSWATI SALUNKE
RespondentVIKRAM SALUNKE

Ruling

1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4

5) 6 SWATI SALUNKE,) Case Number: FDI-19-790987) 7 Petitioner) Hearing Date: June 2, 2026) 8 VS.) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM) 9 VIKRAM SALUNKE,) Department: 404) 10 Respondent) Presiding: AI MORI) 11) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER: FINANCIAL SETTLEMENT FROM COMMUNITY PROPERTY 13 TENTATIVE RULING 14 Having read and considered the pleadings, declarations, and other evidence submitted in this matter, the 15 Court makes the following findings and orders: 16 1) On for hearing is Respondent’s Request for Order filed 4/7/2026. 17 2) There is no Proof of Service on file for Respondent’s Request for Order and Petitioner did not file a 18 Responsive Declaration. 19 3) The hearing on Respondent’s Request for Order is hereby continued to Tuesday, 8/11/2026 at 9:00 20 AM in Dept. 404. 21 4) By the deadlines set forth in the Code of Civil Procedure, Respondent shall have the following 22 documents served on Petitioner: 23 a.

Respondent’s Request for Order filed 4/7/2026 24 b. Blank Responsive Declaration 25 c.

Tentative Ruling

Instructions 26 d. Findings and Order After Hearing for the 6/2/2026 hearing date (which will be mailed to 27 Respondent) 28 5) The Court will prepare the Findings and Order After Hearing. 29

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share