DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD26682000·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing about 2 months agoHEARING REQUIRED

JOHN MURRAY VS. NURIA PAREDES DE RAMIREZ ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion For An Order Compelling Defendant Rudy Jesus Ramirez

Hearing date
Jun 29, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJOHN MURRAY
DefendantNURIA PAREDES DE RAMIREZ
DefendantRUDY JESUS RAMIREZ

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD26682000 - June 29, 2026 Hearing date: June 29, 2026 Case number: CUD26682000 Case title: JOHN MURRAY VS. NURIA PAREDES DE RAMIREZ ET AL Case Number: | | CUD26682000 | Case Title: | | JOHN MURRAY VS. NURIA PAREDES DE RAMIREZ ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-06-29 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion For An Order Compelling Defendant Rudy Jesus Ramirez | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for June 29, 2026.

Line 14. PLAINTIFF JOHN MURRAY Notice Of Motion And Motion For An Order Compelling Defendant Rudy Jesus Ramirez HEARING REQUIRED. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share