DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25625609·sf·Civil·Civil
Hearing about 2 months agoOff calendar. No proof of service and not timely filed in compliance with Code of Civil Procedure, section 1005, subdivision (b). In addition, a motion for leave to amend must comply with Rule of Court 3.1324.

GARY M WAITE VS. EDWARD M HIGGINBOTHAM

Motion For Leave To Amend

Hearing date
Jun 29, 2026
Department
301
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffGARY M WAITE
DefendantEDWARD M HIGGINBOTHAM

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 301 - CGC25625609 - June 29, 2026 Hearing date: June 29, 2026 Case number: CGC25625609 Case title: GARY M WAITE VS. EDWARD M HIGGINBOTHAM Case Number: | | CGC25625609 | Case Title: | | GARY M WAITE VS. EDWARD M HIGGINBOTHAM | Court Date: | | 2026-06-29 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Motion For Leave To Amend | Rulings: | | On the Law & Motion/Discovery calendar for Monday, June 29, 2026, Line 4, PLAINTIFF GARY WAITE'S Motion For Leave To Amend. Off calendar. No proof of service and not timely filed in compliance with Code of Civil Procedure, section 1005, subdivision (b). In addition, a motion for leave to amend must comply with Rule of Court 3.1324. =(301/CVA) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share