DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26PB-0033229·shasta·Probate·Probate
Hearing about 2 months agoDENIED

ESTATE OF BRUCE DUNN

Objection to Actions of Administrator

Hearing date
Jun 29, 2026
Department
44
Judge
Prevailing
Opposing Party
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Ruling

CASE NUMBER: 26PB-0033229 This matter is on calendar for hearing on an Objection to Actions of Administrator, Notice of Alleged Fraudulent Activity, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Embezzlement, Theft of Estate Assets, and Request for Court Investigation. The matter has not been properly noticed. The proof of service for the Personal Representative filed on June 12, 2026, is incomplete as to item 2. Additionally, there is no proof of service for any of the beneficiaries of the trust. The Court notes a Request for Special Notice was filed on June 12, 2026, by the Department of Health Care Services, therefore they are entitled to notice of any further proceedings. It is unclear from the Objection whether Petitioner is an interest party as defined by Probate Code Section 48 The Petition is DENIED without prejudice. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

ESTATE OF BILLY DURBIN

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share