DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CVPG18-0029493·shasta·Probate·Guardianship
Hearing about 2 months agoGRANTED

GUARDIANSHIP OF JOBE PHENGMANY

Petition to Remove Co-Guardian

Hearing date
Jun 29, 2026
Department
42
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

RespondentMichael Joiner

Ruling

CASE NUMBER: CVPG18-0029493 Disclosure Re: guardianship cases involving Shasta County Health and Human Services Agency-Judge Wood discloses that her step-daughter, Erinn Watts, is the Administrative Branch Director of the Health and Human Services Agency. In that position, Judge Wood’s step-daughter does not have any involvement in the investigation, management, prosecution or defense of guardianship cases. However, the Court makes this disclosure of an employment relationship between an investigating agency and the Court’s first degree relative as required by California Code of Judicial Ethics.

This matter is on calendar for further proceedings on a Petition to Remove Co-Guardian, Michael Joiner. The Court notes Mr. Joiner has been suspended as Co-Guardian pending further order of the court. Proof of service has been filed for the minor and sibling, Jordan. The matter has been properly noticed. No objections have been raised. The paperwork appears to be in order. The Court has reviewed and considered the Court Investigator’s report filed on April 14, 2026, and agrees with the recommendation to grant the Petition. The Court GRANTS the Petition. A proposed Order has not been lodged. Petitioner shall prepare the Order. The Court confirms the future date of February 1, 2027, for Annual Review. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

GUARDIANSHIP OF RAYMOND & NALANI POM

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share