DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV-0207586·shasta·Civil·Civil
Hearing about 2 months agoCONTINUED

WARD, ET AL. VS. LEVINDOFSKE, ET AL.

Trial setting

Hearing date
Jun 29, 2026
Department
63
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jul 20, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffWard
DefendantLevindofske

Ruling

CASE NUMBER: 25CV-0207586 This matter is on calendar for trial setting. Defendants have not filed a responsive pleading to the First Amended Complain filed May 13, 2026. The matter is not at issue. The Court notes that Defendants filed an automatic extension under CCP § 435.5(a)(2). The Court notes the Opposition filed by Plaintiff. There is no motion presently before the Court, however, the Court notes that CCP § 435.5(a)(2) reads, in part, “If the parties are unable to meet and confer at least 5 days before the date the motion to strike must be filed, the moving party shall be granted an automatic 30-day extension of time within which to file a motion to strike.” The matter is continued to Monday, July 20, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 63 for status of responsive pleading and possibly trial setting. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

WHITRED HOLDINGS, LLC, ET AL. VS. THE MCCONNELL FOUNDATION

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share