DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV-0208843·shasta·Civil·Personal Injury
Hearing about 2 months agoAppearance required

BIANCHIN VS. ARIK, MD, ET AL.

Trial setting

Hearing date
Jun 29, 2026
Department
64
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffBianchin
DefendantArik, MD
DefendantDignity Health Medical Foundation
DefendantDignity Health Medical Group – North State

Ruling

CASE NUMBER: 25CV-0208843 This matter is on calendar for trial setting, the previous date having been vacated pursuant to stipulation and order. Plaintiff’s CMC represents that all parties named in the complaint have been served, appeared, or were dismissed. However, on April 23, 2026, Plaintiff filed a Doe Amendment naming Dignity Health Medical Foundation, and Dignity Health Medical Group – North State. No proof of service of summons is on file for either party. The parties are ordered to appear today to provide a status of service and to set a future review hearing date for status and trial setting.

CAVALRY SPV I, LLC AS ASSIGNEE OF CITI BANK, N.A. VS. KAMENEV

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share