DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
FL 1803029·marin·FamilyLaw·Spousal Support
Hearing about 2 months agoGRANTED. Ordered Husband to pay Wife $2,700/month spousal support effective May 1, 2026.

John Gaeta v. Rose Laston

Request for Order – Spousal Support

Hearing date
Jun 26, 2026
Department
E
Prevailing
Opposing Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$172,561$14,380$52$24,723$147,786$13,387$1,116$27,074$2,256$2,700

Parties

PetitionerJohn Gaeta
RespondentRose Laston

Ruling

This matter was continued for hearing on Petitioner/Husband’s Request for Order (“RFO”) to terminate spousal support. On 2/13/2026 the Court set spousal support at zero effective as of 12/23/26. On 3/20/2026, Husband was ordered to increase his work search efforts, making at least 5 employment inquiries per week, and to provide the Court with a 2026 year-to-date profit & loss statement for Ai Media, a Declaration updating the Court on how he is meeting his monthly expenses, and an updated Income & Expense Declaration.

On 6/12/2026 Respondent/Wife filed a Supplemental Declaration, an updated Income & Expense Declaration with paystubs attached and, and she lodged her 2025 income tax returns with the Court. On 6/16/2026 Husband lodged his 2025 income tax returns. In disregard of the Court’s 3/20/2026 Order, Husband failed to provide an updated Income & Expense Declaration, profit & loss statement for Ai Media, or a Declaration updating the Court on how he is meeting his monthly expenses.

Husband’s 2025 Form 1040 shows his total income for the year to be $172,561 ($14,380/month), which includes $52 in wages, $24,723 in pensions/annuities and $147,786 in business income. He paid real property taxes of $13,387 ($1,116/month) in mortgage interest deduction of $27,074 ($2,256/month).

Due to Husband’s failure to abide by the Court’s order to demonstrate meaningful work search efforts and to provide the financial information he was ordered to provide, the Court, adopts the Wife’s proposal, and orders as follows:

1. Effective May 1, 2026, Huband shall pay to Wife, as and spousal support, the sum of $2,700/month, payable on or before the 1st day of each month.

2. Spousal support shall continue until Wife remarries, either party dies, or further Court order.

3. Spousal support is neither taxable to the recipient nor deductible by the payor.

SO ORDERED.

Counsel for Wife shall prepare the order.

Any party who disagrees with the Court's tentative ruling and wishes to have oral argument must notify the Court at (415) 444-7046 and opposing counsel (or if the opposing party is selfrepresented, notice must be given directly to the opposing party) of their intent to appear at the hearing for oral argument by 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing, as required by Marin County Superior Court Family Law Local Rules 7.12(B) and (C). Notice may be given by telephone or in person. Absent proper notice, no oral argument will be permitted. If no request for oral argument is made, the tentative ruling will become the order of the Court.

Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, persons who requested oral argument must appear for the hearing in person or remotely via Zoom, in accordance with the Comi website guidelines. If appearing remotely via Zoom (video or telephone), you are responsible for ensuring you have adequate connectivity; the Court may proceed in a party’s absence if technical issues arise. Proper Zoom etiquette and courtroom decorum are required, and failure to comply may result in the hearing being halted and an order to appear in person being made.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share