DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
FL 2203762·marin·FamilyLaw·Motion to be Relieved as Counsel
Hearing 2 months agoThe parties are ordered to appear.

Audon Magana Zepeda and Maria D. Briceno

Motion – Relieve Counsel

Hearing date
Jun 11, 2026
Department
B
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerAudon Magana Zepeda
RespondentMaria D. Briceno

Ruling

This matter is on calendar on Maria Briceno’s (Mother’s) attorney’s motion to be relieved as counsel. Counsel for Mother filed a supporting declaration attesting to the readiness of Counsel to inform the Court in camera as to the basis for the withdrawal.

The parties are ordered to appear.

Parties must comply with Marin County Superior Court Local Rules, Rule 7.12(B), (C), which provide that if a party wants to present oral argument, the party must contact the Court at (415) 444-7046 and all opposing parties by 4:00 p.m. the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. Notice may be by telephone or in person to all other parties that argument is being requested (i.e., it is not necessary to speak with counsel or parties directly.) Unless the Court and all parties have been notified of a request to present oral argument, no oral argument will be permitted except by order of the Court. In the event no party requests oral argument in accordance with Rule 7.12(C), the tentative ruling shall become the order of the court.

IT IS ORDERED that evidentiary hearings shall be in-person in Department B. For routine appearances, the parties may access Department B for video conference via a link on the court website. Litigants in the virtual courtroom are required to leave the video screen on and wait for your case to be called.

FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are responsible for ensuring that they have a good connection and that they are available for the hearing. If the connection is inadequate, the Court may proceed with the hearing in the party’s absence.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share