DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24PR00642·sonoma·Probate·Probate
Hearing 2 months agoGRANTED

Guardianship of Logan Maurice Carrillo

Petition for Visitation

Hearing date
Jun 16, 2026
Department
Unknown
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerLily Worden
DefendantTerri Worden

Ruling

Guardianship Calendar Tentative Rulings Tuesday, June 16, 2026

1. Guardianship of Logan Maurice Carrillo 24PR00642 Other Hearing

TENTATIVE RULING: APPEARANCES ARE NOT REQUIRED. The Court has received and considered the Petition for Visitation filed by Lily Worden, and her accompanying declaration, as well as the declaration filed by the Guardian, Terri Worden, in response to the petition. By agreement Lily Worden is ordered to have a minimum of two visits per week with the ward, Logan. Of the two visits, at least one visit shall be for attendance for Logan’s therapy session on Monday, Wednesday, or Friday at 3:00 p.m., unless recommended against by the therapist.

Each visit is to last a minimum of two hours, and all visits are to be supervised by either the Guardian, the Guardian’s sister, Lynn Perfetti, or any other mutually agreeable third party. These orders describe the minimum visitation that is to occur, and the parties are at liberty to participate in any additional visitation as is mutually agreed upon, though all visits must be supervised. Following a substantial period of successful visitation pursuant to these orders, either party may petition the court to modify the supervision requirement.

2. Guardianship of Kehlani Isabella Zamudio Velez 26PR00134 Appointment of Guardian

TENTATIVE RULING: APPEARANCES ARE REQUIRED. On April 7, 2026, Petitioner was ordered to correct and cure several deficiencies with the petition and to file an amended petition no later than May 22, 2026. Since the April 7, 2026, court date, the Court has not received any additional filing. Petitioner is to appear and explain why she has failed to cure the deficiencies in the petition and show cause why the petition for guardianship should not be denied.

3. Guardianship of Amayntha Taylor McGlothlin 26PR00339 Appointment of Guardian

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share