DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD24674278·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
Hearing about 2 months agoCONTINUED

AVALON OCEAN AVENUE LP VS. CAIXUAN LI ET AL

Motion For Entry Of Judgment For Possession And Monetary Damages Pursuant To Stipulation

Hearing date
Jun 26, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jul 6, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffAVALON OCEAN AVENUE LP
DefendantCAIXUAN LI

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD24674278 - June 26, 2026 Hearing date: June 26, 2026 Case number: CUD24674278 Case title: AVALON OCEAN AVENUE LP VS. CAIXUAN LI ET AL Case Number: | | CUD24674278 | Case Title: | | AVALON OCEAN AVENUE LP VS. CAIXUAN LI ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-06-26 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Motion For Entry Of Judgment For Possession And Monetary Damages Pursuant To Stipulation | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for June 26, 2026. Line 5.

PLAINTIFF AVALON OCEAN AVENUE LP Motion For Entry Of Judgment For Possession And Monetary Damages Pursuant To Stipulation is CONTINUED to July 6, 2026 on the Court's own motion. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share