DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC26633140·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing about 2 months agoOFF CALENDAR

TIM BROWN VS. ANAND GOHEL ET AL

DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Jun 26, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffTIM BROWN
DefendantANAND GOHEL

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC26633140 - June 26, 2026 Hearing date: June 26, 2026 Case number: CGC26633140 Case title: TIM BROWN VS. ANAND GOHEL ET AL Case Number: | | CGC26633140 | Case Title: | | TIM BROWN VS. ANAND GOHEL ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-06-26 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for June 26, 2026. Line 4.

DEFENDANT ANAND GOHEL DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT is OFF CALENDAR.

The parties are ordered to meet in confer are required under CCP 430.41 "in person, by telephone, or by video conference" on a mutually agreed-upon date no later than July 10, 2026. In the parties are not able to agree on a date or manner of the meeting, the parties shall meet and confer in-person at 400 McAllister St, San Francisco California on July 2, 2026 at 1:30 p.m. Thereafter, defendant may re-file its demurrer if necessary or file another responsive pleading. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share