Estrada v. Garcia
Motion for leave to file second amended complaint; Motion to compel further responses to tax-related discovery
Motion type
Parties
Attorneys
Ruling
Case: Estrada v. Garcia Case No. CV2025-2260 Hearing Date: June 25, 2026 Department Fourteen 9:00 a.m.
Motion for leave:
Plaintiffs Felipe Estrada and Alicia Navarrete’s unopposed motion for leave to file second amended complaint is GRANTED. (Code Civ. Proc., § 473; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1324; Schaps decl., ¶¶ 1-12, Exhibits A-D.) The proposed second amended complaint, attached as Exhibit A to the declaration of Michael A. Schaps, is deemed filed as of the hearing date.
If no hearing is requested, this tentative ruling is effective immediately. No formal order pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312 or further notice is required.
Motion to compel further:
On the Court’s own motion, plaintiffs’ motion to compel further responses to tax-related discovery is CONTINUED to August 26, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. in Department Fourteen.
2 of 6
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”