DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CV2025-1132·yolo·Civil·Civil
Hearing about 2 months agoDENIED

Lodewyk Enterprises, L.P. v. Trig Builders, Inc.

Motion to vacate a default

Hearing date
Jun 25, 2026
Department
Fourteen
Judge
Prevailing
Plaintiff
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

DefendantTrig Builders, Inc.
DefendantYossi Malul

Ruling

Case: Lodewyk Enterprises, L.P. v. Trig Builders, Inc. Case No. CV2025-1132 Hearing Date: June 25, 2026 Department Fourteen 9:00 a.m.

Defendants Trig Builders, Inc. and Yossi Malul’s motion to vacate a default is DENIED. (Code Civ. Proc., § 473, subds. (b) & (d).) As to defendants’ request for relief under section 473(b), defendants did not file this motion within six months after the default judgment was taken, and the motion was not “accompanied by a copy of the answer or other pleading proposed to be filed therein.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 473, subd. (b).) As to defendants’ request for relief under section 473(d), defendants have failed to demonstrate that they were not properly served with the summons and complaint. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 473, subd. (d), 415.20, subd. (b); see also Evid. Code, § 647; Malul decl., ¶¶ 1-6.)

If no hearing is requested, this tentative ruling is effective immediately. No formal order pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312 or further notice is required.

3 of 6

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share