Malik v. Flagstar Bank, N.A.
motion to file second amended complaint; motion for judgment on the pleadings
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
Case: Malik v. Flagstar Bank, N.A. Case No. CV2025-0929 Hearing Date: June 23, 2026 Department Thirteen 9:00 a.m.
Plaintiff’s motion to file second amended complaint
Plaintiff Nadir Malik’s motion to file second amended complaint is GRANTED. (Code Civ. Proc., § 473, subd. (a)(1); Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1324.) If no hearing is requested, this tentative ruling is effective immediately. No formal order pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312 or further notice is required.
Defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings
Defendant Flagstar Bank, N.A.’s motion for judgment on the pleadings is DROPPED FROM CALENDAR AS MOOT. (Code Civ. Proc., § 438; State Compensation Ins. Fund v. Superior Court (2010) 184 Cal.App.4th 1124, 1131, [the filing of an amended complaint moots a motion directed to a prior complaint because there is but one complaint in a civil action].)
5 of 5
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”