Notice Of Motion And Motion For Leave To File Second Amended Cross Complaint (Ccp 473(A)(1); Crc 3.1324)
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25624078 - June 22, 2026 Hearing date: June 22, 2026 Case number: CGC25624078 Case title: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION VS. WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, NOT IN ITS ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25624078 | Case Title: | | U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION VS. WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, NOT IN ITS ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-06-22 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion For Leave To File Second Amended Cross Complaint (Ccp 473(A)(1); Crc 3.1324); Memorandum Of Points And Authorities; And Declaration | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for June 22, 2026. Line 5.
CROSS COMPLAINANT JOHN HOFMEYER Motion For Leave To File Second Amended Cross Complaint (Ccp 473(A)(1); Crc 3.1324); is GRANTED. Any party may seek a trial continuance in department 206 if necessary upon the filing and service of the Second Amended Cross-Complaint. Second Amended Cross-Complaint shall be filed no later than June 22, 2026 and served within 15 days of filing. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”