DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26CV-02272·merced·Civil·Unlawful Detainer
Hearing 2 months agoAppearance required

Parties withheld vs Parties withheld

Motion to Set Aside Default, Setting Aside Judgment

Hearing date
Jun 18, 2026
Department
9
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Ruling

comply with the orders to provide discovery and therefore the Court concludes it is unlikely a lesser sanction would be effective.

In accordance with Code of Civil Procedure section 2023.030, subdivision (d)(3), the complaint by plaintiff Bernabe Ramos Blas against Defendant is dismissed with prejudice.

The Court will sign the proposed order submitted with the moving papers.

Motion for Terminating Sanctions Re: Nora Magallanes

The unopposed motion by defendant Edgard Jouseph Quinnones Carrasquillo for an order imposing terminating sanctions against plaintiff Nora Magallanes as a sanction for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the court’s written orders dated February 18, 2026, requiring Plaintiff to provide verified responses to Defendant’s Special Interrogatories, Set Two, and Request for Production of Documents, Set Two, is GRANTED. Defendant served Plaintiff with notice of the court’s orders. (Matthew C. Jaime Decl., Ex. 12.)

It is undisputed Plaintiff has not provided Defendant with responses to the special interrogatories and request for production of documents. (Jaime Decl., ¶ 14.) By failing to file written opposition, Plaintiff has not provided any explanation for her willful failure to comply with the orders to provide discovery and therefore the Court concludes it is unlikely a lesser sanction would be effective.

In accordance with Code of Civil Procedure section 2023.030, subdivision (d)(3), the complaint by plaintiff Nora Magallanes against Defendant is dismissed with prejudice.

The Court will sign the proposed order submitted with the moving papers.

26CV-02272 [Parties’ names withheld pursuant to CCP § 1161.2(a)(1)]

Motion to Set Aside Default, Setting Aside Judgment

Appearance required.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share